Commentary for Chullin 232:24
רישא נראה כאוכל נבלות הכא איכא שחיטה
This [sc. our Mishnah] was taught before he [R'Joshua] retracted, the other after he retracted.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. 'A.Z. 350and b. It was R. Joshua who originally suggested that the milk in the stomach of a nebelah animal was forbidden; subsequently he retracted this. Now our Mishnah which, according to Samuel's interpretation, suggests that the milk in the stomach of a nebelah is forbidden is obviously the view of R. Joshua before he retracted; whereas Samuel's statement as regards the cheese of gentiles follows the later view of R. Joshua.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 232:24. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.