Commentary for Chullin 240:29

במאי פליגי

But [it will be refuted thus], It is so with regard to terumah and the firstfruits since on account of them people incur the penalty of death and the penalty of the [added] fifth! - Rather it must be inferred either from terumah and one of the other cases<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., either the case of leavened bread, or of the carcass of a clean bird (Rashi, but v. Tosaf. s.v.) . The inference is drawn by reducing these cases to their common features, that is, each is a forbidden substance and the liquid made from it is forbidden like the substance itself.');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 240:29. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.