Commentary for Chullin 241:20

ואי דלא חשיב עליה בטוליה בטליה

and if he did not intend it [as a foodstuff], he has then surely abandoned it! - R'Abin and R'Meyasha [each offered a suggestion]; one suggested the case where he intended part of it [as a foodstuff],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But he did not expressly state which part he intended as a foodstuff. Therefore, by itself it cannot contract uncleanness, for in an egg's bulk thereof only part of it is a foodstuff, but that part which was intended as a foodstuff can be reckoned together with other foodstuff to make up the quantity of an egg's bulk.');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 241:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.