Commentary for Chullin 246:14

טרפה ששחטה מטמאה במוקדשין

Now it follows, does it not, that in the case of a camel it is not regarded as a connective?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As soon as the extent of a handgrip of the hide has been flayed. And there is no mention of any apprehension lest on account of this ruling, people might be led to believe that even when less than a handgrip had been flayed the hide is not to be regarded as a connective. This then conflicts with R. Nahman's statement supra.');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 246:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.