Commentary for Chullin 263:52
אי בכור הוא כוליה דידי הוא ואי לאו בכור הוא הב לי מתנתאי
SAID, 'EXCEPT THE DUES', HE IS EXEMPT FROM GIVING THE DUES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The purchaser is exempt from giving the dues for they had not become his property at all.');"><sup>32</sup></span> IF A MAN SAID, SELL ME THE ENTRAILS OF A COW', AND AMONG THEM WERE THE PRIESTLY DUES, HE MUST GIVE THEM TO A PRIEST AND [THE SELLER] NEED NOT ALLOW ANY REDUCTION IN THE PURCHASE PRICE ON THAT ACCOUNT. BUT IF HE BOUGHT THEM FROM HIM BY WEIGHT, HE MUST GIVE THEM TO A PRIEST, AND [THE SELLER] MUST ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE PRICE ON THAT ACCOUNT.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 131a.');"><sup>33</sup></span> <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Why is this so?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That, in the first clause, all the animals are exempt from the dues because of the firstling that is mixed up with them.');"><sup>34</sup></span> - The priest can surely approach him with a double claim<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'from two sides'.');"><sup>35</sup></span> saying [of each animal].' If it is the firstling, it is all mine, and if it is not the firstling, then give me my dues!'
Explore commentary for Chullin 263:52. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.