Commentary for Chullin 46:12

ואי דר"מ לר' מאיר מדלקי עליה חמץ הוא

Now in our case, since there is imposed upon this person the duty of bringing a Thank-offering as well as the cakes, he does not know whether he must regard these [cakes of siur] as leavened and so bring for the rest unleavened cakes, or as Unleavened and so bring leavened cakes [among the others]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The difficulty that is raised by R. Huna's statement is this. The original assumption that this man's obligation ended with the bringing of the cakes cannot stand, for according to the law as stated by R. Huna he must bring all the forty cakes that accompany the thank-offering as well as the thank-offering itself. Consequently this man is in a dilemma, for even if it were accepted that siur is a condition of doubt, his position is no better, since he does not know what other cakes he must now bring.');">⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 46:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.