Commentary for Chullin 46:6
תיקו
either leavened or unleavened', and he brought siur?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Pes. 48b. In the matter of siur there are two disputes between R. Meir and R. Judah. (a) As to the definition of siur: R. Meir says. It is dough the surface of which has already become pale (which indicates that fermentation has already begun) ; R. Judah says. It is dough the surface of which has become wrinkled (which is some time after it has turned pale) . (b) As to the law of siur: R. Meir says that whosoever eats siur (as defined by him) on the Passover is liable to stripes; R. Judah says that whosoever eats siur (as defined by him) on the Passover is not liable to any punishment. Moreover, siur as defined by R. Judah is regarded by R. Meir as leavened, and whosoever eats of it on the Passover is liable to the punishment of Kareth; and on the other hand, siur, as defined by R. Meir is regarded by R. Judah as unleavened, and one may eat it on the Passover:');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 46:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.