Commentary for Chullin 65:4

דלמא לעולם לא הדר ביה ור' זירא לדבריו דרבא קאמר וליה לא סבירא ליה

but he merely formulated his question from the point of view of Raba,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to Raba's view who stated above that Resh Lakish's ruling did not apply to the case where the intestines were pierced after the cutting of the first organ, the question arises: Would the animal be free from the uncleanness of nebelah or not?');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 65:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.