Commentary for Eruvin 102:4

ורב חסדא אמר מחלוקת במקום פלוני דר' מאיר סבר עני אין עשיר לא ורבי יהודה סבר אחד עני ואחד עשיר אבל במקומי דברי הכל אחד עני ואחד עשיר דעיקר עירוב ברגל

R'Hisda, however, said: They<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Meir and R. Judah.');">¹²</span> differ only where the expression used was, 'In such and such a place',<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case neither the man himself nor his bread was at the place appointed.');">¹³</span> R'Meir being of the opinion that the law was relaxed for the poor only<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'yes'.');">¹⁴</span> but not for the rich, while R'Judah holds that it was relaxed for both poor and rich; but where the expression used was 'In my place' all<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even R. Meir.');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 102:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.