Commentary for Eruvin 109:13

ומאי קמ"ל דנותנין קרפף לזו וקרפף לזו הא אמרה רב הונא חדא זימנא דתנן

while the latter deals with one that had breaches on two sides.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 6.');">³⁵</span> Then what does he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Huna in the last ruling cited.');">³⁶</span> inform us? That a karpaf<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of a length of seventy and two thirds cubits.');">³⁷</span> is allowed for each section.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the same manner as one is allowed for each of two adjacent towns which are thereby combined to form one town for the purposes of Sabbath movements.');">³⁸</span> But did not R'Huna once lay down such a ruling, as we learned:

Explore commentary for Eruvin 109:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.