Commentary for Eruvin 114:6

אמר לך רב הונא הא אתמר עלה אמר רבה אמר רב אידי א"ר חנינא לא משולשין ממש אלא רואין כל שאילו מטיל אמצעי ביניהן ויהיו משולשין ואין בין זה לזה אלא ק"מ אמה ואחת ושליש עשה אמצעי את שלשתן להיות אחד

an objection against R'Huna?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who allowed a karpaf for every town (or village) and according to whom the two outer villages would have been combined into one, even in the absence of the third village, owing to the fact that no more than the space of two karpafs (2 X 70 2/3 = 141 1/3 cubits) intervened between them.');">¹¹</span> - R'Huna can answer you: Surely, in connection with this ruling it was stated: Rabbah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Var. lec. 'Raba', 'It. Adda'.');">¹²</span> in the name of R'Idi who had it from R'Hanina explained: There is no need for the villages to be arranged in the shape of an equilateral<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'actually'.');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 114:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.