Commentary for Eruvin 132:4

ואמרת לן עלה כי אמר שמואל אין ביטול רשות מחצר לחצר לא אמרן אלא שתי חצירות ופתח אחד ביניהן אבל זו לפנים מזו מתוך שאוסרין זה על זה מבטלין

they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The inner tenants, if they prepared no 'erub even among themselves.');">¹¹</span> may also renounce their rights.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of passage, to which they are entitled in the outer courtyard, and the tenants of the latter are thereby enabled to use their courtyard.');">¹²</span> Could I, the former questioned, have reported such a ruling in the name of Samuel? Did not Samuel in fact state: 'In the laws of 'erub we can only be guided<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. no further relaxation of the law is permitted.');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 132:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.