Commentary for Eruvin 132:9

וכי אתמר בהא בהא קאמר רבי יוחנן אבל בהך מודי ליה לשמואל צריכא

Abaye stated: Samuel's ruling that<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that which Samuel said'.');">²⁶</span> 'no domain may be renounced where two courtyards are involved'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra q.v. notes.');">²⁷</span> applies only<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'he did not say them, but'.');">²⁸</span> to two courtyards that had one door in common but where two courtyards were one within the other, since the tenants impose restrictions upon one another, they may also renounce their rights.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra p. 462, nn. 2ff.');">²⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 132:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.