Commentary for Eruvin 134:17

א"ל נסמוך אשיתוף א"ל הא לא שתפינן נימרו ליה לנכרי ליתי ליה

But wherein does the one differ from the other?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., why should the law against moving objects between a karmelith and a private domain be abrogated rather than the one forbidding the movement of objects beyond four cubits in a private domain that was bigger than two beth se'ah?');">⁵⁹</span> - It is usual to move objects within the area of the rock itself<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it was necessary to enact a preventive measure.');">⁶⁰</span> but it is unusual to move objects from it into the sea or from the sea into it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Against that which is unusual no preventive measures were enacted. Only in the case of a private domain and a karmelith on land, the movement of objects between which is not infrequent, has such a preventive measure been deemed necessary.');">⁶¹</span> There was once a child whose warm water<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That was prepared for him prior to the Sabbath, in connection with his circumcision due on the Sabbath day, and kept warm for the purpose.');">⁶²</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 134:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.