Commentary for Eruvin 136:14

אמר רבן גמליאל מעשה בצדוקי אחד שהיה דר עמנו: צדוקי מאן דכר שמיה

hold the view that renunciation may not be followed by renunciation but<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In reply to the objection: Why does R. Meir impose restrictions even where the tenant acted unwittingly?');">⁴³</span> the point at Issue between them<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It. Meir and R. Judah.');">⁴⁴</span> is whether a penalty has been imposed in the case of one who acted unwittingly on account of one who acted intentionally. One Master<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Meir.');">⁴⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 136:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.