Commentary for Eruvin 136:7
דרב דאמר כרבנן ושמואל דאמר כר"א
shall not assume<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By repeated renunciations and the consequent freedom in the moving of objects between courtyards without any further legal preliminaries.');"><sup>19</sup></span> the character of a mockery and jest. [To turn to] the main text: Rab ruled: Renunciation may be followed by renunciation, and Samuel ruled: Renunciation may not be followed by renunciation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra q.v. notes.');"><sup>20</sup></span> Must it be assumed that Rab and Samuel differ on the same principle as that on which the Rabbis and R'Eliezer differed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra 26b.');"><sup>21</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 136:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.