Commentary for Eruvin 137:11

אי כרבנן האמרי חשוד לדבר א' לא הוי חשוד לכל התורה כולה

but when he observed R'Judah Nesi'ah he covered it up.' A person of this type',<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., who is ashamed to carry the forbidden object in the presence of a noted personality.');">³³</span> [the Master said.] 'is in accordance with the view of R'Judah entitled to renounce his share'. R'Huna stated: Who is regarded as an Israelite in mumar?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is now assumed to mean a mumar or apostate in all respects.');">³⁴</span> He who desecrates the Sabbath in public. Said R'Nahman to him: In agreement with whose view?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Is this statement made.');">³⁵</span> If [it be suggested that it is] in agreement with that of R'Meir who holds that a person who is suspected of disregarding one matter [of law] is held suspect in regard to all the Torah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Bek. 30b.');">³⁶</span> the statement should also apply to any of the other prohibitions of the Torah;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not only to that against the desecration of the Sabbath.');">³⁷</span> and if [it is suggested that it is] in agreement with the view of the Rabbis,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who differ from R. Meir (v. Bek. 30b) .');">³⁸</span> did they not rule, it may be objected, that one who is suspected of disregarding one law is not held suspected in regard to all the Torah

Explore commentary for Eruvin 137:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.