Commentary for Eruvin 137:3

והתניא עד שלא נתן רשותו הוציא בין בשוגג בין במזיד יכול לבטל דברי רבי מאיר רבי יהודה אומר בשוגג יכול לבטל במזיד אינו יכול לבטל

where the residents of the alley had taken possession of the alley<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Before the man who presented them with, or renounced in their favour his share had carried out his objects.');">⁹</span> while the latter deals with one<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' lit., 'here'.');">⁸</span> where the residents of the alley had not taken possession of the alley; and so it was also taught: If he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A tenant who, forgetting to join in the common 'erub, presented his share to his neighbours.');">¹⁰</span> carried out an object<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Into the alley towards which his courtyard as well as the courtyards of the others opened.');">¹¹</span> before he had renounced his share,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the alley, in favour of his neighbours.');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 137:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.