Commentary for Eruvin 139:21

בעא מיניה רבא מרב נחמן יורש מהו שיבטל רשות

was necessary only for this case: Even<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Bah.');">⁶⁵</span> where they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The tenants who presented their shares.');">⁶⁶</span> said to him,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The one of the two who did not join in their 'erub.');">⁶⁷</span> 'acquire our shares on the condition that you transfer them'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To the other of the two tenants who did not join in the 'erub (cf. supra p. 487, n. 10) .');">⁶⁸</span> Raba inquired of R'Nahman: May all heir<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whose father, from whom he inherited his estate, had forgotten to contribute to the 'erub of his courtyard and died on the Sabbath.');">⁶⁹</span> renounce his share? '<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which he inherited (cf. prev. n.) on that day and which his father had not renounced in favour of his neighbours.');">⁷⁰</span> [

Explore commentary for Eruvin 139:21. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.