Commentary for Eruvin 140:13
תא שמע ישראל וגר שרויין במגורה אחת ומת גר מבעוד יום
he imposes no restrictions. If, however, a man in the street<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. one who did not live in that courtyard but was the owner of a house in it.');"><sup>32</sup></span> died, having left his share to one of the tenants of the courtyard, he imposes no restrictions, if this occurred while it was yet day,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he has sufficient time before the Sabbath to join in the 'erub in respect of that house.');"><sup>33</sup></span> but if it occurred after dusk,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When no 'erub may any longer be prepared.');"><sup>34</sup></span> he imposes restrictions. Now why should he impose restrictions?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In agreement with R. Nahman that an heir is entitled to renounce the share he inherited.');"><sup>35</sup></span> Let him renounce his share!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And thus enable the tenants to enjoy the unrestricted use of their courtyard.');"><sup>36</sup></span> - The ruling that he imposes restrictions applies only so long as he did not renounce<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'what also (is meant by) he imposes restrictions that he learned? Until he would renounce'.');"><sup>37</sup></span> his share. Come and hear: If an Israelite and a proselyte lived in one dwelling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Or 'barn', the doors of their compartments or huts opening into one court.');"><sup>38</sup></span> and the proselyte died<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Leaving no heirs.');"><sup>39</sup></span> while it was yet day<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of the Sabbath eve.');"><sup>40</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 140:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.