Commentary for Eruvin 140:6

כל שנאסר למקצת שבת נאסר לכל השבת כולה כגון שני בתים בשני צידי רה"ר והקיפום נכרים מחיצה בשבת

or side-post'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the Sabbath.');">²</span> had been removed.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' During the Sabbath. Although the use of an alley that was not provided with cross-beam or side-post is else' where restricted. the removal of either in this case, since the alley was well provided with the one or the other during a part of the Sabbath, does not affect the tenants' right to its continued and unrestricted use. This ruling is not covered by the one specified, since in the latter case the walls remained intact while in the former they were absent (cf. supra 17b) .');">¹³</span> 'Whatever is forbidden during a part of the Sabbath remains forbidden throughout the Sabbath', as, for instance, in the case of two houses, that were respectively situated on the two sides of a public domain which gentiles surrounded with a wall during the Sabbath.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As in the absence of the wall no 'erub was admissible on the Sabbath eve, it is forbidden to move objects from any of the houses into the newly enclosed area, even if one of the householders renounced his right in that area in favour of his neighbour.');">¹⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 140:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.