Commentary for Eruvin 140:9
אימא חוץ מתורת ביטול רשות
from which<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since only 'the man who renounced his share', not his heir, was mentioned.');"><sup>20</sup></span> it follows, does it not, that only he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The original householder.');"><sup>21</sup></span> may do so but not his heir?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'he, yes; heir, not'. How then could R. Nahman maintain that an heir may also renounce his share?');"><sup>22</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 140:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.