Commentary for Eruvin 144:12

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> האחין שהיו אוכלין על שלחן אביהם וישנים בבתיהם צריכין עירוב לכל אחד ואחד לפיכך אם שכח אחד מהם ולא עירב מבטל את רשותו

with them,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 504, n. 14.');">³⁴</span> but if they carried their 'erub t a place other [than their hall]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. if it is deposited in one of the other houses of the courtyard.');">³⁵</span> all<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even Beth Hillel.');">³⁶</span> agree that a separate contribution to the 'erub is required for each company.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The point at issue being whether the several companies in the one hall, who are in the same position as that of a number of tenants who joined in one 'erub, must contribute individually to the 'erub even where it is deposited in their hall, Beth Shammai maintaining that they must while Beth Hillel hold that they need not.');">³⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 144:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.