Commentary for Eruvin 144:3

להך לישנא דאמר רב נחמן אף במסיפס מחלוקת לימא תהוי תיובתא

provides support; while against that version according to which R'Nahman stated 'the dispute relates only to partitions of stakes'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But that 'where the partitions were ten handbreadths high' Beth Hillel agree that a 'separate contribution. . must be made'.');">⁷</span> this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Judah's assertion (cf. supra n. 5) according to which Beth Hillel require no separate contributions where the partitions, though ten handbreadths high, do not reach the ceiling.');">⁸</span> presents an objection. Does this,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The statement of R. Judah that 'they only differ where the partitions do not reach the ceiling'.');">⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 144:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.