Commentary for Eruvin 146:10

כולה רבי מאיר היא וטעמא מאי אמר רבי מאיר בעינן עירוב ובעינן שיתוף שלא לשכח תורת עירוב מן התינוקות והכא כיון דרובה עירבו לא משתכחא

It is consequently obvious that [the tenant]' did not renounce his share. And since the final clause deals with one who made no renunciation in the earlier clause<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Dealing with the case of a tenant who forgot to contribute to the 'erub of his courtyard.');">²⁰</span> also must deal with one who made no renunciation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In agreement with the Rabbis who recognize shittuf as valid for the purpose of 'erub also.');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 146:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.