Commentary for Eruvin 146:13

איתיביה בעל הבית שהיה שותף לשכניו לזה ביין ולזה ביין אין צריכין לערב התם דאפקיה ועייליה

represents the view of R'Meir; for the only reason why<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'and what is the reason?'');">²⁸</span> R'Meir ruled that both 'erub and shittuf were required is that the law of 'erub should not be forgotten by the children, but in this case,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 512, n. 14.');">²⁹</span> since most of the tenants did contribute to the 'erub,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Only one of them having failed to contribute his share.');">³⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 146:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.