Commentary for Eruvin 146:3

מבני מבוי ולא נשתתף מותרין בחצירות ואסורין במבוי שהמבוי לחצירות כחצר לבתים:

<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Whose view is this?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first clause of our MISHNAH:');">⁷</span> Apparently that of R'Meir who laid down that it is necessary to have both 'erub and shittuf Read, however, the middle clause: IF, HOWEVER, SHITTUF WAS MADE FOR THE ALLEY, THEY ARE PERMITTED THE UNRESTRICTED USE OF BOTH, which represents, does it not, the view of the Rabbis who laid down that one of these<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Either 'erub or shittuf.');">⁸</span> is sufficient?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Is it likely, however, that two adjacent clauses should represent two opposing views?');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 146:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.