Commentary for Eruvin 149:9

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> כי אתא רב דימי א"ר ינאי זו דברי רבי עקיבא דאמר אפילו רגל המותרת במקומה אוסרת שלא במקומה אבל חכמים אומרים כשם שרגל המותרת אינה אוסרת כך רגל האסורה אינה אוסרת

AND ONE TENANT, WHETHER OF THE INNER COURTYARD OR OF THE OUTER COURTYARD, FORGOT TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ERUB, THE USE OF BOTH COURTYARDS IS FORBIDDEN.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The reason is discussed infra.');">²³</span> IF THE COURTYARDS. HOWEVER, BELONGED TO SEPARATE INDIVIDUALS THESE NEED NOT PREPARE ANY 'ERUB.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the single owner of the inner courtyard is permitted its unrestricted use he, in agreement with the view of the Rabbis, cannot impose restrictions in the use of the outer one though he has a right of way through it.');">²⁸</span> <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>When R'Dimi came<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From Palestine to Babylon.');">²⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 149:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.