Commentary for Eruvin 150:5

לימא שמואל ורבי יוחנן בפלוגתא דרבנן ור"ע קא מיפלגי דשמואל אמר כרבנן ורבי יוחנן דאמר כר"ע

- The tenants of one courtyard cannot renounce their rights in favour of those of another.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'there is no renunciation of rights from one courtyard to another'. As those of the outer courtyard cannot consequently renounce this right in the inner one in favour of its tenants the latter might well plead against the disadvantage resulting from their join 'erub', 'We have associated with you in order to improve etc.'');">¹²</span> Must it be assumed that Samuel and R'Johanan<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who offered (supra 66b, 68a) on the permissibility of renunciation by the tenants of one courtyard in favour of those of another, where a door led from one courtyard into the other.');">¹³</span> differ on the same principle<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As has just been explained.');">¹⁴</span> as that on which the Rabbis and R'Akiba differ, Samuel holding the same view as the Rabbis and R'Johanan holding that of R'Akiba?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But if the principle is the same, why should it be discussed twice?');">¹⁵</span> - Samuel can answer you: I may maintain my view even according to R'Akiba, for it is only here,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'until here'.');">¹⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 150:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.