Commentary for Eruvin 157:3

אלא אמר רב אסי מאן תנא עירובין רבי יוסי היא

that is likely to be removed is on a par with ordinary stubble<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' About which its owners intention is not known at all.');">⁶</span> and is not deemed to be abandoned?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tosef. Ohal. XV; which shows that, according to R. Jose, earth is deemed to be abandoned even if no declaration to this effect has been made by its owner. How then could R. Huna maintain that the Mishnah of Ohal. cited represents R. Jose's view?');">⁷</span> - Rather, said R'Assi, who is it that taught 'Erubin?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the law of 'erub in our Mishnah from which it follows that earth is deemed to be abandoned even where its owner did not declare his intention to leave it in its place.');">⁸</span> It is R'Jose.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whose view here is in full agreement with the view he expressed in the last Baraitha cited.');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 157:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.