Commentary for Eruvin 160:10

אלא בשני מינין אפילו נתמעט נמי לא דתניא כלה האוכל ממין אחד אין צריך להודיע מב' מינים צריך להודיע

should apply,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cur. edd., 'not' is wanting from MS.M.');">³⁰</span> should it not, even if the food had only been reduced, since it was taught: If nothing of the food<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of: an 'erub.');">³¹</span> remained<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the same, it is now presumed, applies also where the food had only been reduced.');">³²</span> there is no need to inform, the residents if the new 'erub is prepared of the same kind,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the original.');">³³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 160:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.