Commentary for Eruvin 162:18

ולא פליגי והא אנן תנן נתוספו עליהן מוסיף ומזכה וצריך להודיע

the other replied, did I tell you; but not concerning partitions.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The principle underlying the permissibility of the use of an alley by means of cross-beam or side-post.');">⁴¹</span> [Since,] said R'Aha son of Raba to R'Ashi, [it has been said,] 'The halachah [is in agreement with R'Judah]' it must be implied that [the Rabbis] are at variance on the point,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Had they held the same opinion there would have been no need to state that the halachah was in agreement with R. Judah.');">⁴²</span> but did not R'Joshua B'Levi in fact lay down that whenever R'Judah stated in<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'in our',');">⁴³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 162:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.