Commentary for Eruvin 162:3

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> מ"ט דר' אליעזר הא לא משך

<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>What is R'Eliezer's reason<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For his ruling in our Mishnah that the man who gave the ma'ah acquires his share in the 'erub.');">⁷</span> seeing that the man performed no meshikah? - R'Nahman citing Rabbah B'Abbuha replied: R'Eliezer<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By ruling that possession may be acquired by means of money alone.');">⁸</span> treated this case as that of the 'four seasons of the year'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where a similar relaxation of the laws of acquisition was allowed.');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 162:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.