Commentary for Eruvin 162:8
בד' פרקים אלו דזכות הוא לו זכין לו שלא בפניו בשאר ימות השנה דחוב הוא לו אין חבין לו אלא בפניו
But why, seeing that the buyer had performed meshikah? - R'Samuel B'Isaac<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' MS. M., inserts 'R'.');"><sup>18</sup></span> replied: The fact is that we are here dealing with a case where the buyer performed no meshikah but the seller transferred possession<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of a part of the ox to the value of a denar.');"><sup>19</sup></span> to him through a third party.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Whom the buyer did not appoint for the purpose.');"><sup>20</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 162:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.