Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Eruvin 18:7

[there is a difference of opinion between] R'Hiyya and R'Simeon B'Rabbi. One maintains that it is regarded as a valid side-post and the other maintains that it is not regarded as a valid side-post. You may conclude that it was R'Hiyya who maintained that 'it is regarded as a valid side-post'; for R'Hiyya taught:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tosef. 'Er. I, 10, infra 15a.');"><sup>17</sup></span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 18:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse