Commentary for Eruvin 182:3
טעמא דלא עירבו הא עירבו לא הא מני רבנן היא
who<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since there were no other tenants either in the one or in the other to impose restrictions.');"><sup>9</sup></span> need not prepare an 'erub;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And may, therefore, carry their objects from their houses into their respective domains. Hence (cf. Supra n. 9) the prohibition.');"><sup>10</sup></span> but if they were occupied by many tenants<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the gallery had a number of tenants and the courtyard also had a number of tenants.');"><sup>11</sup></span> who forgot to prepare an erub,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For their respective domains, so that no object could be moved from any of the no uses into the courtyard and gallery respectively into which that house opened.');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 182:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.