Commentary for Eruvin 182:6

ור"ש מתיר שהיה ר' שמעון אומר כל זמן שהן של רבים ושכחו ולא עירבו גג וחצר ואכסדרה ומרפסת וקרפף ומבוי כולן רשות אחת הן

since karpaf and alley were not mentioned.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In agreement with their view. A ruling of R. Simeon would have included these also since he regards these as well as the others as one domain.');">²⁰</span> This is conclusive. Come and hear: If five courtyards were open one into the other and also into an alley and all their tenants forgot to prepare an erub, it is forbidden to carry in or to carry out from a courtyard into the alley<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Rabbis, whose view is here represented, regarding an alley as a karpaf into which no objects may be carried.');">²¹</span> or from the alley into a courtyard; objects, however, that were in a courtyard when the Sabbath began may be moved about within the courtyard, but in the alley this is forbidden;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is now assumed to mean that even objects that were in the alley itself at the time the Sabbath commenced may not be moved in it because, so long as no joint 'erub had been prepared, it is subject to the restrictions of a karmelith.');">²²</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 182:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.