Commentary for Eruvin 187:16

וליפלוג בצידי רשות הרבים בעלמא אי איפליגו בצידי רשות הרבים בעלמא הוה אמרינן כי פליגי רבנן עליה דרבי אליעזר הני מילי היכא דאיכא חיפופי אבל היכא דליכא חיפופי אימא מודו ליה קא משמע לן

had been lost in that courtyard,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the exact position of the former wall having been lost the men of the public domain claimed that their domain extended beyond the limits which the tenants of the courtyard claim as the original position of the wall, and it is this spot, not all the courtyard, that R. Eliezer regards as a public domain.');">²⁶</span> surely, [it could be retorted], did not R'Hanina state, 'The dispute<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Between R. Eliezer and the Sages in our MISHNAH:');">²⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 187:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.