Commentary for Eruvin 188:4

ושמואל אמר אפילו ביתר מעשר אי הכי מרוח אחת נמי

Is it in that it may be assumed<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where only one side has a breach.');">⁶</span> that the edge of the ceiling is deemed to extend downward and to close the gap, why should it not be assumed in the case of breaches in two sides also that the edge of the beam extends and closes them up? - At the school of Rab it was explained on the authority of Rab: This is a case of a house whose breaches, for instance, occurred in a corner<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where no doors are made and where the breaches cannot be treated as doorways.');">⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 188:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.