Commentary for Eruvin 189:7

אמר רב ששת לאסור וכן אמר רבי יוחנן לאסור תניא נמי הכי אמר רבי יוסי כשם שאסורין לעתיד לבא כך אסורין לאותו שבת

it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since either side-post might be deemed to be extended horizontally and to form a third wall. A Sukkah that has three walls is valid.');">¹⁶</span> is valid as a sukkah;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since either side-post might be deemed to be extended horizontally and to form a third wall. A Sukkah that has three walls is valid.');">¹⁶</span> but if it had no side-posts, Abaye ruled, it is still valid while Raba ruled: It is invali Abaye ruled that it was valid because the edge of the ceiling is deemed to descend and to close up,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The side where there was no proper wall.');">¹⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 189:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.