Commentary for Eruvin 191:12

דילמא ס"ל לילה זמן תפילין הוא שבת לאו זמן תפילין הוא דהא שמעינן ליה לרבי עקיבא דאמר לילה זמן תפילין הוא שבת לאו זמן תפילין הוא

since they themselves are a sign,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Ex. XXXI, 13: For it (sc. the Sabbath and so also either holy days) is a sign between me and you. The fact that Israel observes the holy days is in itself sufficient proof of their adherence to the divine commandments.');">³⁸</span> are excluded?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Men. 36b. How then could the ruling of the first Tanna in our Mishnah (which, as has been explained supra, assumed the Sabbath to be a time for the wearing of tefillin) be attributed to R. Akiba?');">³⁹</span> - It<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first ruling in our MISHNAH:');">⁴⁰</span> represents rather the view of the following Tanna.

Explore commentary for Eruvin 191:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.