Commentary for Eruvin 194:2
חסורי מיחסרא והכי קתני במה דברים אמורים בסכנת עו"ג אבל בסכנת ליסטים מוליכן פחות פחות מד' אמות:
Read them the final clause, R'SIMEON RULED: HE SHALL PASS THEM TO HIS FELLOW AND HIS FELLOW SHALL PASS THEM TO HIS FELLOW, would not this cause much greater publicity?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And thus enhance the danger.');"><sup>3</sup></span> A clause is wanting in our Mishnah, the proper reading being as follows: This applies to danger from idolaters but in the case of danger from highwaymen he carries them in small stages each of less than four cubits. R'SIMEON RULED: HE SHALL PASS THEM TO HIS FELLOW etc. On what principle do they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R Simeon and the first Tanna.');"><sup>4</sup></span> differ? - One Master<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first Tanna according to the emendation of the Mishnah just given.');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 194:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.