Commentary for Eruvin 200:16

תניא נמי הכי גם בלא דעת נפש לא טוב זה הכופה אשתו לדבר מצוה ואץ ברגלים חוטא זה הבועל ושונה

Nowadays, however, since we have it as an established rule that the law is in agreement with R'Simeon,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That it is permitted to perform an act though, as a result, an unintended forbidden one also is thereby performed.');">²²</span> it is permitted to walk on grass] in all the cases mentioned.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., ' 'all of them are permitted' . As the act of walking is permissible on the Sabbath it cannot be forbidden even where it results in the unintentional act of tearing up the grass which when intentional is forbidden on the Sabbath.');">²³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 200:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.