Commentary for Eruvin 206:10
ורבי יוחנן אמר לא אמרו יתור בגדים אלא במקום בגדים אבל שלא במקום בגדים לא הוי יתור בגדים
why should he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The priest's friend who removes the wen.');"><sup>31</sup></span> not be permitted even in accordance with the view of R'Eliezer<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who, as suggested, requires a change to be made wherever possible.');"><sup>32</sup></span> to remove it with his hand?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is only a shebuth and a change from the usual mode of removal.');"><sup>33</sup></span> - What an argument is this! If you grant that it represents the view of R'Eliezer<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who in the case of the preliminary requisites of a precept draws no distinction between a Pentateuchal prohibition and a shebuth and allows both to be superseded, requiring only a change from the usual procedure.');"><sup>34</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 206:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.