Commentary for Eruvin 206:8

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> כהן שלקה באצבעו כורך עליה גמי במקדש אבל לא במדינה אם להוציא דם כאן וכאן אסור:

you might<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In addition to what may be derived even now, viz., that the preliminary requisites of a precept may override only a shebuth but not a Pentateuchal prohibition.');">²³</span> easily derive<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From the fact that the use of the bare hand only (a shebuth) and not that of an instrument (a Pentateuchal prohibition) has been allowed.');">²⁴</span> the statement made by R'Eleazar, for R'Eleazar stated: They<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Eliezer and the Rabbis.');">²⁵</span> only differ in the case of removal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of one's finger nails (Shah. 94b) .');">²⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 206:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.