Commentary for Eruvin 207:2

לימא פליגא דרב יהודה בריה דרבי חייא שאני צלצול קטן דחשיב

This is in fact identical with the ruling which Raba cited in the name of R'Hisda. Must it be conceded that this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab's ruling which does not regard a piece of material that was less than three handbreadths by three as an unlawful addition to the priest's garments.');">⁵</span> differs from the view of R'Judah son of R'Hiyya?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. Supra p. 722, n. 11.');">⁶</span> - A bandage is different<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From a piece of material of similar size.');">⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 207:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.