Commentary for Eruvin 33:18

התם בהיזמי והיגי הכא בשאר עצים

Must it then be assumed that R'Huna is of the same opinion as R'Judah while R'Isaac is of that of R'Jose?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Is it likely, however, that Amoras would be merely repeating a dispute of Tannas?');">³⁵</span> - R'Huna can tell you, 'I can maintain my view even in accordance with that of R'Jose; for R'Jose maintained his view there only because there were no partitions, but here there are partitions'. And R'Isaac can tell you,'I can maintain my view even in agreement with R'Judah; for R'Judah upheld his view there only because the tenants were in existence, but here there was not a [sufficient number of] tenants'.

Explore commentary for Eruvin 33:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.