Commentary for Eruvin 44:16

ת"ש שבילי בית גילגול וכיוצא בהן רשות היחיד לשבת ורה"ר לטומאה

[and about such alleys it was ruled that they have the status of] 'a private domain in respect of Sabbath and that of a public one in respect of levitical defilement'. Now, whose [view is here expressed]? If it be suggested: That of the Rabbis; it could be objected:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'now'.');">³⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 44:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.