Commentary for Eruvin 44:18
מני אילימא רבנן השתא ומה התם דניחא תשמישתא אמרי רבנן לא אתו רבים ומבטלי לה מחיצתא הכא דלא ניחא תשמישתא לא כל שכן אלא לאו רבי יהודה היא
- No; it may in fact [be the view of] the Rabbis,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The SAGES.');"><sup>39</sup></span> but<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 157, n. 11.');"><sup>40</sup></span> the statement was required [on account of the ruling,] 'And a public domain in respect of levitical defilement'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the other ruling was mentioned merely as an antithesis.');"><sup>41</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 44:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.