Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Eruvin 62:13

הקדש שחיללו על גב קרקע דרחמנא אמר ונתן הכסף וקם לו:

hence we were informed [that the ruling is] in agreement with the latter's reply.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'as he answered him', that, since at the time the Levite received his due, the produce was already subject to terumah gedolah, it remains unfit for use until such terumah had been set apart for it.');"><sup>30</sup></span> NOR WITH SECOND TITHE AND CONSECRATED [FOOD] THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REDEEMED. Is not this obvious? - [The ruling was] required in that case only where they were redeemed but their redemption was not performed in the prescribed manner;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'according to their law'. iunhxt');"><sup>31</sup></span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 62:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse